Legal Opinion
Ira Holtzman v. Gregory Turza
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 26, 2013No. 11-3188, 11-3746PublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge.
Believing that CPAs would find his services attractive, attorney Gregory Turza sent more than 200 of them occasional fax sheets containing business advice. The faxes produced more business—but not for Turza. He became the defendant in this suit under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, 47 U.S.C. § 227, which prohibits any person from sending unsolicited fax advertisements. Even when the Act permits fax ads—as it does to persons who have consented to receive them, or to those who have established business relations with the sender—the fax must tell the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lincoln v. VigilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Six (6) Mexican Workers v. Arizona Citrus Growers Bodine Produce Company, Inc. Robert Fletcher, D/B/A Fletcher FarmsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Palm Beach Golf Center-Boca, Inc. v. John G. Sarris, D.D.S., P.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Sandusky Wellness Center, LLC v. ASD Specialty Healthcare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Sandusky Wellness Center, LLC v. Medtox Scientific, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Imhoff Investment, L.L.C. v. Alfoccino, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- American Copper & Brass, Inc. v. Lake City Industrial Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.