Legal Opinion
Dahl v. Bain Capital Partners, LLC
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided December 15, 2008No. Civil Action 07-12388-EFHPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HARRINGTON, Senior District Judge.
This ease comes before the court on Defendants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint (Docket No. 127) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Defendants provide two (2) grounds on which the complaint should be dismissed. First, they argue that since the conduct at issue is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the plaintiffs claims are preempted from consideration under the antitrust laws. Second, the defendants argue that the plaintiffs have failed to properly plead a Sherman Act § 1…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Silver v. New York Stock ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. BillingSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hinds County, Miss. v. Wachovia Bank, NADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Weng v. SolisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Dahl v. Bain Capital Partners, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- Dahl v. Bain Capital Partners, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009