Legal Opinion
Sidibe v. Sutter Health
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 11, 2022No. 3:12-cv-04854Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 DJENEBA SIDIBE, et al., Case No. 12-cv-04854-LB 12 Plaintiffs, SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER 13 v. REGARDING JURY INSTRUCTIONS 14 SUTTER HEALTH, et al., Re: ECF Nos. 1491, 1492, 1500, 1503, 15 Defendants. 1508, and 1509. 16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 Sutter has asked the court to instruct the jury to consider a “business justification” defense to 19 the plaintiffs’ per se tying claim.1 The plaintiffs contend that procompetitive effects or “business 20 justifications” do not apply to their per se tying…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.