Legal Opinion

Bogdon v. Los Angeles & S. L. R.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1922No. 3683PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District, Salt Lake County; J. Louis Brown, Judge. Action by Dan Bogdon, a minor, by his guardian ad litem, John Bogdon, against the Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad Company. Judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

Dan Bogdon, a minor, by his guardian ad litem, brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries which he alleges he sustained through the negligence of the defendant. In view that there is no question raised respecting the sufficiency of the complaint, it is unnecessary to set forth the allegations therein contained, except to state that the plaintiff relies upon the doctrine of attractive nuisances and further relies upon the law applicable to the storing of dangerous explosives upon the owner’s premises at such a place or places where children of immature judgment are permitted…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Powers v. HarlowMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. City of Indianapolis v. EmmelmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Brown v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Barney v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  5. Kelly v. BenasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Loveland v. Orem City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Hancock v. Aiken Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  3. Smith v. Illinois Central R. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Schafer v. Hotel Martin CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  5. Eves v. Littig Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API