Legal Opinion
Brescia v. Mugridge
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 24, 1967PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJack Stanislaw, J.
The petitioners, property owners and taxpayers in the Incorporated Village of Asharoken, have brought this proceeding to enjoin the respondent Mugridge from acting as Mayor of the village and the respondent Mack from acting as Trustee. Issue has been joined, for the most part, as to the law applicable to the material facts which are essentially not disputed.
Mugridge was and is continuing to act as Mayor of Asharoken. There was at least a hiatus in his incumbency and possibly an end to it altogether. It seems that in the early morning of September 6, 1966 Mugridge, for reasons not relevant to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Smith v. DillonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- People Ex Rel. Corscadden v. . HoweNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Felice v. SwezeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Mapes v. SwezeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Fauci v. LeeNew York Supreme Court · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Division of Human Rights v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Morris v. CahillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Vescio v. City Manager of City of YonkersNew York Supreme Court · 1972
- Wonderly v. Division of New York State PoliceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Anderson v. KrupsakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.