Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Krupsak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 1976PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLarkin, J.

The petitioners seek judgment, pursuant to CPLR article 78, voiding the election of appellants Batista, Kendall and Yavner as Regents of the University of the State of New York. Vacancies on the Board of Regents are filled pursuant to section 202 of the Education Law, which provides in relevant portion: "Commencing April first, nineteen hundred seventy-four, each regent shall be elected for a term of seven years, each such term to expire on the first day of April. Each regent shall be elected by the legislature by concurrent resolution in the preceding March, on or before the first Tuesday of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Coleman v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Matter of Sherrill v. . O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Jerry v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. People Ex Rel. McLaughlin v. Board of Police CommissionersNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. MATTER OF TAYLOR v. SiseNew York Court of Appeals · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morris v. CahillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. County of Ontario v. Western Finger Lakes Solid Waste Management AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Dekdebrun v. HardtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. City of Mount Vernon v. State of New York Board of Equalization & AssessmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Ellis v. EatonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API