Legal Opinion

American Reciprocal Insurers v. Bessonette

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1963PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

We could not improve upon appellant-plaintiff’s statement of this case taken from its brief:

“This appeal involves an action of law for damages tried by the court sitting without a jury.
“The owner, hereinafter referred to as the Lafferty partnership, contracted with defendant (this should be defendants) Bessonette and Graff to erect a grocery warehouse and with defendant Pacific Automatic Sprinkler to install a sprinkler system. Defendant Bessonette and Graff * * * caused a concrete wall to be constructed so as to cause a main sprinkler pipe to break after the building had been completed and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hale v. DepaoliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Strandholm v. General Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Begley v. Adaber Realty & Investment CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  4. Leigh v. WadsworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. Soott v. Lawrence Warehouse Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Wights v. Staff Jennings, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Newman v. Tualatin Development Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Kuhns v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal., Western Oper.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. MacOmber v. CoxOregon Supreme Court · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API