Legal Opinion
Miner v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 9, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2013-0633PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge
The two plaintiffs in this matter, Charmin Miner and Gary Baldwin, allege that the defendants, the District of Columbia and four District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department (“MPD”) Officers, violated the plaintiffs’ constitutional and common law rights during a traffic stop at the Anacostia Metro Station in Southeast Washington, D.C. See generally First Am. Compl. (“FAC”), ECF No. 13. The defendants now seek summary judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, on all claims. Defs.’ Mot. Summ. J. (“Defs.’…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harvey v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Phillips v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Rosemond v. WashingtonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025