Legal Opinion

Nicholson v. Shafe

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 18, 2009No. 08-11426, 08-13058PublishedCited by 165 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Circuit Judge:

This appeal calls upon us to address the scope of the Rooker-Feldman 1 doctrine, which provides that “lower federal courts are precluded from exercising appellate jurisdiction over final state-court judgments.” Lance v. Dennis, 546 U.S. 459, 463, 126 S.Ct. 1198, 163 L.Ed.2d 1059 (2006). The Supreme Court has only applied the Rooker-Feldman doctrine as a bar to jurisdiction on two occasions, the first instance being Rooker and the second instance being Feldman. Recently, in Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Saudi Basic Industries Corporation, 544 U.S. 280, 125 S.Ct. 1517, 161…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Lance v. DennisSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Reese v. HerbertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by165 opinions

  1. Surender Malhan v. Secretary United States DepartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  2. Fane Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
  3. Mikhail v. KahnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Rebekka Anne Behr v. James CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
  5. Hunter v. McMahonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023

160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API