Legal Opinion
Fane Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, Florida
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided April 1, 2013No. 11-15448PublishedCited by 133 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RESTANI, Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellant Fane Lozman (“Loz-man” or “Appellant”) appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his amended complaint asserting, inter alia, violations of his Constitutional rights, based on the Rook-er-Feldman doctrine 1 and res judicata principles. For the following reasons, we reverse.
JURISDICTION AND STANDARD OF REVIEW
The jurisdiction of the federal courts to decide this matter is the primary issue here. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 to review a final order of a district court. We review de novo the application of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine,…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Osheroff v. Humana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Rebekka Anne Behr v. James CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- Marnika Lewis v. Governor of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Beepot v. J.P. Morgan Chase National Corporate Services, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2014
- K.T. v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.