Legal Opinion

Croft v. Parnell

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 2010No. S-13200PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHRISTEN, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Sponsors of an initiative challenge the lieutenant governor’s refusal to certify the initiative for the ballot. The lieutenant governor denied certification because he determined that the initiative violated the single-subject requirement of AS 15.45.040. The sponsors filed suit in the superior court seeking a declaration that the initiative did not violate the single-subject rule. The superior court granted summary judgment in favor of the lieutenant governor and the sponsors appeal. Because the “soft dedication” of funds connecting the two aspects of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. Evans Ex Rel. Kutch v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. North Slope Borough v. Sohio Petroleum Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Native Village of Elim v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pebble Ltd. Partnership v. Lake & Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Pebble Ltd. Partnership v. Lake & Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API