Legal Opinion
Rosner v. Rosner
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 28, 2011No. 2:10-cv-03072PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
The plaintiff in this case, Marianne Rosner, asserts against all of the defendants a single cause of action for violation of the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”). The defendants now move to dismiss this claim. For the reasons that follow, the Court grants the defendants’ motions to dismiss.
I. BACKGROUND
The plaintiff Marianne Rosner either was or is married to the defendant Andrew Rosner, an attorney admitted in New York State. Although her marriage to Andrew Rosner forms the basis for this lawsuit, this fact…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harris v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Adam Daley Wilson, et al. v. Dana E. Prescott, et al.District Court, D. Maine · 2025
- Conte v. Tapps Supermarket, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2022
- Dawn Bachi-Reffitt v. Kevin ReffittCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Hubbuch v. Helbraun & Levey LLPDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025