Legal Opinion

Tuck v. Tuck

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 28, 1966No. Civ. 567PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMURRAY, J. pro tem. *

Plaintiff filed a complaint for dissolution of a partnership and for accounting. After the defendant had answered, generally denying plaintiff’s allegations, the matter was heard by the court sitting without a jury. On January 17, 1964, the trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiff and on January 22, 1964, filed a memorandum re decision. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were filed; judgment was filed and entered; and, plaintiff filed and mailed to defendant’s counsel a notice of entry of judgment all on February 21, 1964. On March 4, 1964, defendant filed a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Akley v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Tabor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Uzyel v. KadishaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Micalizio v. MicalizioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. People v. ByronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Tuck v. ThuesenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. LaBorne v. MulvanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API