Legal Opinion
Tuck v. Thuesen
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 3, 1970No. Civ. 1153PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GINSBURG, J. *
This is an appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to an order sustaining a demurrer to appellant’s first amended, complaint .without leave to amend. The complaint sought to state a cause of action for legal malpractice; the court held the cause was barred by the two-year statute of limitations. (Code Civ. Proc., § 339, subd. 1.)
The respondent, an attorney, represented the appellant in an action for partnership dissolution and an accounting (Fresno County Superior Court action No. 107110). An adverse judgment was rendered on February 21, 1964. Respondent thereupon assured…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Heyer v. FlaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- WILCOX v. the Executors of PlummerSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Buck v. MorrossisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Bowers v. DickersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Griffith v. ZavlarisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- McAllister v. County of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- City of King City v. Community Bank of CentralCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Gbur v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971