Legal Opinion
People v. Citrino
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 30, 1970No. Crim. 7734PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHRISTIAN, J.
Anthony Citrino appeals, after trial by jury, from a judgment convicting him of robbery (Pen. Code, § 211.) The question is whether identification testimony upon which the conviction rests should have been excluded as tainted by unduly suggestive pretrial photographic identification procedures.
On the evening of July 10, 1968, two men entered a pharmacy shortly before closing time. The pharmacist (Gleason) and the clerk (Carol Pankovich) were the only other persons present. While one of the men (identified at trial as appellant) made a small purchase from Miss Pankovich,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- People v. CarusoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. MacIntoshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. BoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. PrinceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. OlguinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- J. R. Norton Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. GreeneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.