People v. Caruso
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of first degree robbery. (Pen. Code, § 211.)
At the police lineup defendant did not have the assistance of counsel, a right that has since been held to be guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. (United States v. Wade (1967) 388 U.S. 218 [18 L.Ed.2d 1149, 87 S.Ct. 1926] ; Gilbert v. California (1967) 388 U.S. 263 [18 L.Ed.2d 1178, 87 S.Ct. 1951].) We have heretofore decided, however, that the rule of Wade and Gilbert, requiring the exclusion of in-court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. FeggansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by181 opinions
- Foster v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. MosherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. FloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
176 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.