Legal Opinion

People v. Caruso

California Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1968No. Crim. 11709PublishedCited by 181 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of first degree robbery. (Pen. Code, § 211.)

At the police lineup defendant did not have the assistance of counsel, a right that has since been held to be guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. (United States v. Wade (1967) 388 U.S. 218 [18 L.Ed.2d 1149, 87 S.Ct. 1926] ; Gilbert v. California (1967) 388 U.S. 263 [18 L.Ed.2d 1178, 87 S.Ct. 1951].) We have heretofore decided, however, that the rule of Wade and Gilbert, requiring the exclusion of in-court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. People v. FeggansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by181 opinions

  1. Foster v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. MosherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. FloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

176 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API