Legal Opinion
People v. MacIntosh
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 5, 1968No. Crim. 4642PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.
Defendant Julia Macintosh and a non-appealing co-defendant, Joyce Mills, were convicted of viola tion of Health and Safety Code section 11530 (possession of marijuana). Julia appeals from the order granting her probation.
The two defendants were occupants of the same five-room apartment. The apartment was so arranged that entry into Joyce’s bedroom was through Julia’s bedroom. Julia has two young children who also resided in the apartment with the two women.
At approximately 9 :30 p.m. September 4, 1966, two Sacramento policemen assigned to the child neglect detail visited the apartment house…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. GorgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Robert Bustamonte v. Merle R. Schneckloth, Superintendent, California Conservation CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Brawthen v. H & R BLOCK, INC.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- People v. CitrinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.