Legal Opinion

Pitts' Administrator v. Pitts

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1863PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from the Marion Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

Martha Ann Pitts who was the plaintiff, sued George W. Pitts, administrator of the estate of Stephen Pitts, deceased, upon a promissory note given by his intestate. The note is in this form:

“$1,000. Indianapolis, March 20, 1860.
“Eor value received, I promise to pay, at my death, to Martha Ann' Pitts, 1,000 dollars, without ny relief whatever from the appraisement laws. Stephen Pitts.”

Defendant answered:

1. No consideration.

2. The note was made in consideration of the promise of the plaintiff to live with Stephen Pitts, and manage his household affairs from the date of the note until his death,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Patterson v. CoatsIndiana Supreme Court · 1847
  2. M'Kee v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1836

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Crampton v. LoganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Story v. StorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Lynn v. SebyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Thurston v. NutterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1926
  5. Holland v. HollandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API