Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Coats

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1847PublishedCited by 7 opinions

ERROR to the Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This was an action of assumpsit brought by Patterson against Goats. Tire declaration contained four counts. The first and second are upon special contracts; the third is for money had and received; and the fourth upon an account stated. The first and second counts were demurred to and the demurrers sustained. Issues to the country upon the third and fourth counts; trial by the Court without a jury; and finding and judgment for the defendant.

*501The testimony, which is set out in a bill of exceptions, discloses the following facts: On the 24th of. September, 1845,. Patterson and Coats entered into…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ketchum & Sweet v. EvertsonNew York Supreme Court · 1816
  2. Gillet v. MaynardNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  3. Raymond v. BearnardNew York Supreme Court · 1815
  4. Green v. GreenNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  5. M'Kee v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1836

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dantzeiser v. CookIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Tilford v. RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Harris v. BradleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Pitts' Administrator v. PittsIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Blake v. HedgesIndiana Supreme Court · 1860

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API