Legal Opinion

M'Kee v. Miller

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1836PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ERROR to the Union Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

This was an action of debt, brought by Miller and Lee against M’Kee on a promissory note. The declaration shows, that the note was given by the defendant to the plaintiffs, at Cincinnati, on the 28th of October, 1835, for the sum of 300 dollars, and was payable on the 6th of December following. To this action, the defendant pleaded three special pleas in bar. There was a general demurrer to the pleas, and a judgment for the plaintiffs.

The first'plea is obviously bad, and we shall take no further notice of it.

The third plea is as follows: The defendant says actio non, because he says that on…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barton v. GrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Patterson v. CoatsIndiana Supreme Court · 1847
  3. Pitts' Administrator v. PittsIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Mc Clung & Co. v. LysterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1851

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API