Legal Opinion
Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided October 24, 2012No. Case No. 6:12-cv-272-Orl-36DABPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CHARLENE EDWARDS HONEYWELL, District Judge.
This cause comes before the Court upon Defendant T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc.’s (“T-Mobile” or “Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss Claims of Induced, Contributory, Willful, and Joint Infringement (“Motion to Dismiss”) (Doc. 17). Plaintiff Brandy-wine Communications Technologies, LLC (“Brandywine” or “Plaintiff’) filed a Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss (“Response”) (Doc. 21), to which T-Mobile replied (Doc. 25). The Motion to Dismiss is ripe for review. For the reasons that follow, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss will be granted.
I. BACKGROUND
A…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Quality Foods De Centro America, S.A. And Duroparts De El Salvador, S.A. v. Latin American Agribusiness Development Corporation, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- United Technologies Corp. v. MazerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Zond, Inc. v. Fujitsu Semiconductor Ltd.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- Rembrandt Social Media, LP v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
- Regents of the University v. AT & T Mobility LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- DSM IP Assets, B.V. v. Honeywell International, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2023
- Kirsch Research and Development LLC v. Intertape Polymer CorpDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.