Regents of the University v. AT & T Mobility LLC
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS TO . DISMISS
JOHN R. TUNHEIM, Chief Judge, United States District Court
Inventors at Plaintiff University of Minnesota (“the University”) hold various patents with respect to components of Long-Term Evolution (“LTE”) wireless communications systems. The University is bringing these patent infringement actions — four in totaU-against major wireless service providers: AT & T Mobility LLC (“AT .& T”), Sprint Solutions, Inc. and Sprint Spectrum, . L.P. (together, “Sprint”), T-Mobile USA, Inc. (“T-Mobile”), and Célico Partnership (“Verizon”) (together, “the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- R+L Carriers, Inc. v. DriverTech LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Script Security Solutions LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2016
- Niazi Licensing Corp. v. St. Jude Med. S.C., Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2018
- Cortec Corporation v. Corpac GmbH & Co. KGDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023
- DSM IP Assets, B.V. v. Honeywell International, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2023
- Marmon Foodservice Technologies, Inc. v. Duke Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.