Legal Opinion

Inhabitants of Greenfield v. Burnham

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 5, 1924PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

This is a bill in equity seeking to restrain the defendant from infraction of by-laws establishing building linesun certain streets in Greenfield; to compel him to make restoration of the surface of sidewalks excavated by him, and to exact performance by him of a stipulation made on his receipt of a license to excavate. The answer denies the validity of the establishment of the building lines. A replication sets up that the defendant is estopped to object to the validity of the establishment of the building fines by the pendency of a petition filed by him for the assessment of damages caused…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Corbett v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Moore v. SanfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  3. Pinkham v. Inhabitants of ChelmsfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  4. Reed v. Inhabitants of ActonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  5. Howland v. Inhabitants of GreenfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Barnes v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Hobart-Farrell Plumbing & Heating Co. v. KlaymanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Inhabitants of Watertown v. DanaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  4. Radway v. Selectmen of DennisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Markiewicus v. Town of MethuenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API