Legal Opinion

State v. McLennan

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1917PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Wasco: William L. Bradshaw, Judge. Department 1. Statement by Me. Justice Burnett. Ewen McLennan was indicted with another for the ■crime of larceny of two geldings alleged to be the property of C. E. Matthews. The codefendant was ■acquitted, but, the verdict being adverse to McLennan, he appeals from the consequent judgment.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

The state gave evidence to the effect that Matthews Taised the horses and turned them out on the range in "the spring of 1914; that he saw them at intervals between then and August of the following year; that on *624November 24, 1915, be saw them in the pasture of the defendant with the brand of the latter on their shoulders in the place where his own brand had been previously placed; that he immediately went to Mc-Lennan ’s residence in his absence and left a note with an employee demanding in effect that the defendant, return the horses to Matthews at once and settle. This demand was not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Spain v. Oregon-Washington R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State v. O'DonnellOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  3. State v. RaderOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Shaw v. New Year Gold Mines Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Smitson v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State of Oregon v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Irion v. HydeMontana Supreme Court · 1940
  3. State v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. People v. BergerNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1931
  5. State v. KeelenOregon Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API