State v. Keelen
Oregon Supreme Court
From Union: J. W. Knowles, Judge. Department 2. The defendant was jointly indicted with one Dooley and charged with the larceny of one Ford automobile, the personal property of George Robertson. As a result of a separate trial, the defendant Keelen was found guilty and judgment of conviction entered against him, from which he has appealed.
Read the full summary
From Union: J. W. Knowles, Judge. Department 2. The defendant was jointly indicted with one Dooley and charged with the larceny of one Ford automobile, the personal property of George Robertson. As a result of a separate trial, the defendant Keelen was found guilty and judgment of conviction entered against him, from which he has appealed. At the trial it appeared that George Robertson purchased the car from M. J. Goss about November 5, 1920. Robertson is a laboring man, and had come to La Grande a few days before he purchased the automobile. There he met Dooley, who was jointly indicted with…
1Opinion
Rehearing denied February 7, 1922.
On Petition for Rehearing.
(204 Pac. 162.)
In Banc.
Rehearing Denied.
McCOURT, J.
— The attorneys for the state have filed a petition for rehearing. Therein it is suggested that the conclusion of the court in its opinion herein, that the instruction given by the trial court concerning the possession of recently stolen property was not applicable under the facts of this case, ignores the abrogation of the distinction between accessories before the fact and principals in crimes accomplished by Sections 1458 and 2370, Or. L.
12. The opinion herein does not have the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. OsborneOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- State v. RaderOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Smitson v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1900
- State v. MinnickOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.