Legal Opinion

Chisum v. Brewco Sales & Manufacturing, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided November 27, 1989No. Civ. A. No. 84-0013-O(CS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SIMPSON, District Judge.

The Court having heard evidence at the trial of this matter without intervention of a jury, and having considered the briefs and post-trial memoranda, and the Court being otherwise sufficiently advised, makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:

I.FINDINGS OF FACT

1. This is a patent infringement action.

2. The plaintiff, Finis Lavell Chisum (hereinafter “Chisum”), is an individual residing in Claremore, Oklahoma.

3. Chisum is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 3,630,066 issued December 28, 1971 (the Chisum ’066 patent) and U.S.…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. The Read Corporation and F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. v. Portec, Inc., D/B/A Portec/kolberg DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  2. Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. Metrologic Instruments, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
  3. Saint-Gobain Autover USA, Inc. v. Xinyi Glass North America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
  4. Ziggity Systems, Inc. v. Val Watering SystemsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API