Legal Opinion
Carroll v. Gates Formed Fibre Products
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided July 31, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DANA, Justice.
Carol Carroll appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission denying her petition for order of payment contending that her employer, Gates Formed Fibre Products, accepted the injury by failing to timely controvert the claim. 39 M.R.S.A. § 51-B (1989). 1 The Commissioner found that, although the employer had notice of the injury, the employer had no notice or knowledge of an event that constituted an obligation to pay benefits. Finding no error in the Commissioner’s decision, we affirm.
Carroll suffered a head injury on Wednesday, April 29, 1987, her first day of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Stickles v. United Parcel ServiceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- Tompkins v. Wade & Searway Construction Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Norton v. C.P. Blouin, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- Wentworth v. Manpower Temporary ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mathieu v. Bath Iron WorksSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Steve L. Michaud v. Caribou Ford-Mercury, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2024
- Pearson v. Freeport School DepartmentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006