Pearson v. Freeport School Department
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
[¶ 1] Nadya Pearson appeals from a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Board hearing officer {Sprague, HO) finding that Pearson’s mental stress injury is not com-pensable under the Workers’ Compensation Act, and that the Freeport School Department did not violate the “fourteen-day rule,” see Me. W.C.B. Rule, ch. 1, § 1, by failing to timely pay benefits or file a notice of controversy in response to her claim. Pearson contends that the hearing officer erred in concluding that no fourteen-day rule violation took place. We disagree, and affirm the decision.
I. BACKGROUND
[¶ 2] Nadya Pearson has…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stickles v. United Parcel ServiceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- Bridgeman v. S.D. Warren Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- Carroll v. Gates Formed Fibre ProductsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Celentano v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
3Cited by1 opinion
- Payne v. PayneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008