Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Freeport School Department

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 27, 2006PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

[¶ 1] Nadya Pearson appeals from a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Board hearing officer {Sprague, HO) finding that Pearson’s mental stress injury is not com-pensable under the Workers’ Compensation Act, and that the Freeport School Department did not violate the “fourteen-day rule,” see Me. W.C.B. Rule, ch. 1, § 1, by failing to timely pay benefits or file a notice of controversy in response to her claim. Pearson contends that the hearing officer erred in concluding that no fourteen-day rule violation took place. We disagree, and affirm the decision.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶ 2] Nadya Pearson has…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stickles v. United Parcel ServiceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  2. Bridgeman v. S.D. Warren Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  3. Carroll v. Gates Formed Fibre ProductsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  4. Celentano v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Payne v. PayneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API