Legal Opinion

American Clay Machinery Co. v. Sedalia Brick & Tile Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 17, 1913PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Pettis Circuit Court. — Hon. H. B. Bhain, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtTrimble, J.

This is an action of replevin brought by.the American Clay Machinery Company to recover possession of certain machinery used in the grinding and drying of clay and thereafter in manufacturing it into brick and other clay products. The machinery in question was sold to the Sedalia Clay Manufacturing Company by written contracts. In each there was a clause providing that said machinery was to remain the property of plaintiff until paid for in. *487full, and that its installation in any building should in no sense be construed as making’ it real estate, or as causing it to form part of the building,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ford v. . CobbNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Tifft v. . HortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Havens v. Germania Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  4. Ginners' Mut. Underwriters of San Angelo v. WileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. In re Williamsburg Knitting MillDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1911

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Marsh v. SpradlingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Leawood National Bank of Kansas City v. City National Bank & Trust Co. of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Kolb v. Golden Rule Baking Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Rothermich v. Union Planters National BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Kelvinator St. Louis, Inc. v. SchaderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API