Legal Opinion

McClellan v. Collar

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 22, 2000No. Docket 185809PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This medical malpractice case is before us on remand from our Supreme Court for reconsideration of a previously decided issue in light of McDougall v Schanz, 461 Mich 15; 597 NW2d 148 (1999). 461 Mich 896 (1999). After further review, we affirm our prior decision to reverse the trial court’s ruling that Dr. Andrew Rosenblum, a cardiologist, was not qualified to render expert testimony with respect to the issue of the negligence of defendant Dr. Alonso Collar, a cardiovascular surgeon.

The facts of this case were set out in our previous opinion, McClellan v Collar, unpublished opinion per…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. McDougall v. SchanzMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Novak v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. People v. ConatMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. People v. WhitfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tobin v. Providence HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Detroit City Council v. Mayor of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Preserve the Dunes, Inc v. Department of Environmental QualityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Michigan State Building & Construction Trades Council v. DirectorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Hartford Ins Co of the Midwest v. Mich Catastrophic Claims AssnMichigan Supreme Court · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API