Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. KENTUCKY BAR ASS'N

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 2005No. 2004-SC-000105-KBPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LAMBERT, Chief Justice.

The Kentucky Bar Association (KBA) recommends that this Court enter an Order finding Curtis J. Hamilton III guilty of violating SCR 8.130 — 1.15(b) and (c).

Hamilton, KBA number 87172, was admitted to practice law in Kentucky on May 1, 1998. Hamilton was also admitted to practice in Ohio in 1995. In September 1997, he became employed as an associate in the law firm of Neel Wilson & Clem (NWC) in Henderson, Kentucky. While working as an associate for NWC he entered into a contract of employment with James and Margaret Gardner on behalf of the firm for…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re JordanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. HamiltonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. James C. Larew v. Hope Law Firm, P.L.C. and Andrew L. Hope, Travis J. Burk and Hope Law Firm & Associates, P.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2022
  4. James C. Larew v. Hope Law Firm, P.L.C. and Andrew L. Hope, Travis J. Burk and Hope Law Firm & Associates, P.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API