Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Hamilton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 2006No. 2006-0247Published

1Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} This cause is pending before the Supreme Court of Ohio in accordance with the reciprocal discipline provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F).

{¶ 2} On February 3, 2006, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed with this court a certified copy of an order of the Supreme Court of Kentucky entered December 22, 2005, in Curtis J. Hamilton III v. Kentucky Bar Association, in case No. 2004-SC-000105-KB, 180 S.W.3d 470, publicly reprimanding respondent and ordering him to complete eight hours of courses in ethics, including four hours dealing with proper handling and administration of funds in trust…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hamilton v. KENTUCKY BAR ASS'NKentucky Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API