Legal Opinion

Coulter v. Capitol Finance Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 14, 1966No. 691PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaice, J.

Nothing else appearing, when a tenant for a fixed term of one year or more holds over after the expiration of such term, the lessor has an election. He may treat him as a trespasser and bring an action to evict him and to recover reasonable compensation for the use of the property, or he may recognize him as still a tenant, having the same rights and duties as under the original lease, except that the tenancy is one from year to year and is terminable by either party upon giving to the other 30 days’ notice directed to the end of any year of such new tenancy. Kearney v. Hare, 265 N.C. 570,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jones v. Palace Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Wilkie v. New York Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Long v. . StaffordNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. FrazelleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. Kearney v. HareSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ellis v. Pauline S. Sprouse Residuary TrustTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Norton v. McCaskillTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Marina Food Associates, Inc. v. Marina Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., N.A. v. RubishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Wm. Muirhead Construction Co. v. Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API