Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Barbed Wire Fence Co. v. Chenoweth

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1899No. 2,818PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

— Appellant brought suit on the following instrument:

“$762.50 Indianapolis, Ind., Mov. 8, 1891.

Rinety days after date pay to the order of The United States Steel Company seven hundred sixty-two and 50-100 dollars, value received and charge the same to account of

“The United States Steel Company,
“Daniel A. Chenoweth.
“To David C. Bryan, Bryan’s Block, Indianapolis.” Indorsed on the back: “David C. Bryan.” “The United *686States Steel Company, by Daniel A Chenoweth.” “Cincinnati Barbed Wire Fence Company, by Janies Lamon, Pr’t.”

The complaint avers the execution of the draft by Ohenoweth individually,…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Carver v. CarverIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Sutherland v. HankinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Boots v. CanineIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Buchanan v. Logansport, Crawfordsville & Southwestern R. W. Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. State ex rel. Ruhlman v. RuhlmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. NorcrossIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Sullivan Machinery Co. v. BreedenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Isgrig v. Franklin National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Gentry v. GentryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. Hill v. CampbellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API