Legal Opinion
Sullivan Machinery Co. v. Breeden
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 9, 1907No. 6,111PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Prom Owen Circuit Court; Joseph W. Williams, Judge. Action by the Sullivan Machinery Company against William T. Breeden, and others. Prom a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRabb, J.
The appellant sued the appellees in the court below for the purchase price of a channeling machine alleged to have been sold by appellant to appellees. The suit was based on a written contract, which reads as follows:
"This agreement entered into June 6, 1902, between the Sullivan Machinery Company, of Chicago, Illinois, a.*d Claremont, New Hampshire, and the Monarch *633Stone Company, of Bloomington, Indiana, witnesseth: The Sullivan Machinery Company agrees to deliver to the Monarch Stone Company, f. o. b. cars Claremont, New Hampshire, not later than June 13, 1902, one new Y Sullivan channeling…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Conant v. National State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Gatling v. NewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
- Robinson Machine Works v. ChandlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Booher v. GoldsboroughIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nave v. PowellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Beech Grove Improvement Co. v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Valley Refrigeration Co. v. Lange Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- Penn American Plate Glass Co. v. De La Vergne Machine Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- International Harvester Co. of America v. HaueisenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.