Herceg v. Wideman
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
Plaintiff, on trial by jury, had verdict and judgment against defendant for damages which plaintiff sustained incident to an automobile collision at an intersection of highways within the city limits of the city of Pontiac. At the close of plaintiff’s proofs, defendant moved for a directed verdict. This motion was denied. After verdict, defendant moved for judgment non obstante veredicto. This motion was denied. In his appeal, defendant asserts that the trial court was in error in refusing to direct a verdict and to enter judgment notwithstanding the verdict for defendant on the ground that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zuidema v. BekkeringMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Carey v. De RoseMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Kok v. LattinMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Knight v. MerignacMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Scurlock v. PeglowMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Batchelor v. Famous Cleaners & Dyers, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1945
- E. F. Hauserman Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1952
- Derby v. HayesMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Lemieux v. OndersmaMichigan Supreme Court · 1939