Legal Opinion

E. F. Hauserman Co. v. United States

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 14, 1952No. 9871PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PICARD, District Judge.

Action under Section 413.15 Michigan Compiled Laws of 1948 by E. F. Hauser-man Company, an Ohio corporation, for the Use and Benefit of Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, a Connecticut corporation, against the United States of America, to recover monies that the Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Hauserman’s insurer, has and must pay John Short, Hauserman’s employee, who following an accident elected to come under the Michigan Workmen’s Compensation Law.

Statement of Facts

The employee was injured while putting up a metal wall separating two bays in defendant’s tank arsenal,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Utley v. Taylor & Gaskin, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
  2. St. John v. NicholsMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Brown v. LilliMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Herceg v. WidemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Guye v. DomasMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America Ex Rel. Estate of Lyda v. OdomSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API