Kuralt v. SAIF Corp. (In re Kuralt)
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEgan, C.J.
*1078*480Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board, asserting that the board erred in reversing an order of an administrative law judge (ALJ) determining that claimant had "good cause" to file a claim after the expiration of the 90-day notice period in accordance with ORS 656.265(4)(c). We conclude on judicial review that the board's order is premised on legal error. ORS 183.482 (8)(a), (b)(A), (c). Accordingly, we reverse and remand the order for reconsideration.
The facts are largely undisputed. Claimant, who works for employer as an HVAC service technician, had just…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Espinoza v. Evergreen Helicopters, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Sekermestrovich v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Meza v. Bruce Packing Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Riddel v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- Lopez v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016