Legal Opinion

Littman v. Magee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 10, 2008PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Saxe, J.P.

Plaintiff alleges that defendants wrongfully prevailed upon him to sell his minority interest in defendants’ closely held corporation, and to execute in that context a broad release, by making assertions that he understood to mean that no material financial information was available beyond the limited materials already supplied to him. Since on a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 the court must accept as true the allegations of the complaint, and give the plaintiff the benefit of any reasonable inference to be drawn from them (see Sokoloff v Harriman Estates Dev.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Danann Realty Corp. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Sokoloff v. Harriman Estates Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Global Minerals & Metals Corp. v. HolmeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Centro Empresarial Cempresa S.A. v. América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V.New York Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Khan v. BDO Seidman, LLPAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  3. Meisel v. GrunbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  4. HSH Nordbank AG v. UBS AGAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Frame v. MaynardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API