Legal Opinion

HSH Nordbank AG v. UBS AG

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 27, 2012PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Friedman, J.

The primary question on this appeal is whether plaintiff HSH Nordbank AG (HSH), a German commercial bank, has stated a cause of action for fraud against defendants UBS AG and UBS Securities LLC (collectively, UBS), an investment bank. The dispute arises from what was essentially a credit default swap transaction, in which, to simplify, HSH, in exchange for a stream of premium payments, assumed the risk of the first half billion dollars of losses on a $3 billion portfolio of securities related to the United States real estate market (the reference pool). In sum…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Rocanova v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Danann Realty Corp. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Centro Empresarial Cempresa S.A. v. América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V.New York Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Citibank, N. A. v. PlapingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Deerfield Communications Corp. v. Chesebrough-Ponds, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Financial Guaranty Insurance v. Putnam Advisory Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  2. Cronos Group Ltd. v. XComIP, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. Basis Yield Alpha Fund v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. De Sole v. Knoedler Gallery, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  5. Bank of America, N.A. v. JB Hanna, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API