Legal Opinion

Territory of Hawaii ex rel. Holloway v. Cotton

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Exceptions erom Circuit Court, Eirst Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

*609OPINION OF THE COURT BY

FREAR, C.J.

The defendants moved for a new trial in the circuit court and, for the purpose of saving their rights as they contend, filed also a short bill of exceptions referring for most of the exceptions to the transcript of the stenographer’s notes, which had not then been prepared, and obtained an extension of time until ten days after filing the transcript in which to file a further bill of exceptions specifying all exceptions shown by the transcript to have been taken and allowed. The motion for a new trial, however, was granted, several terms afterward, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kapiolani Estate, Ltd. v. ThurstonHawaii Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Aylett v. KeaweamahiHawaii Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Magoon v. AhmiHawaii Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cotton v. Territory of Hawaii Ex Rel. HollowaySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Taba v. JardinHawaii Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Decano v. Hutchinson Sugar Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Lahaina Agricultural Co. v. PoahaHawaii Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Mid-Pacific Dress Manufacturing Co. v. CadinhaHawaii Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API