Legal Opinion

Aylett v. Keaweamahi

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1892PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court, by

Judd, C.J.

The plaintiff, Kuhiau, having deceased testate on the eighth day of June, 1891, since the trial of this case before a jury, the *321following persons are substituted therefor with leave to proceed with the suit, viz., Christian Titcomb, by Lorrin A. Thurston and Angeline Kuhiau, his guardians, and Lawrence Kekei and Kaomea, devisees of said Kuhiau.

At the hearing on the bill of exceptions, the attorneys for the plaintiffs moved to dismiss it on the ground that it did not, according to Rule 8, embody the testimony. We find that the bill of exceptions sets out “…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McNitt v. TurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Parkhurst v. Van CortlandCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1816
  3. Coleman v. Manhattan Beach Improvement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
  4. Purinton v. Northern Illinois RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Gregory v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mossman v. Hawaiian GovernmentHawaii Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Godfrey v. RowlandHawaii Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Nahaolelua v. KaaahuHawaii Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Territory of Hawaii ex rel. Holloway v. CottonHawaii Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Kapule v. MokuhiwaHawaii Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API