Legal Opinion

Eggleston v. Wagner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1881PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Error to Kalamazoo. Assumpsit. ’Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

"Wagner brought this action to recover damages on account of Eggleston’s alleged failure to convey his *614interest in certain real and personal property in pursuance, as claimed, of a contract therefor between the parties.

The case was brought to trial last February before a jury in the circuit court for the county of Kalamazoo and under the rulings on points of law a verdict was given in favor of Wagner for $9000. Several objections were taken on the part of Eggleston during the trial and he asks a re-examination on writ of error and bill of exceptions of a portion of them.

Before touching any of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hurley v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. National Bank v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Mead v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  4. Nichols v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1834
  5. Barry v. CoombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1828

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Chenell v. Westbrook CollegeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  4. McPeak v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  5. Juliano v. AbelesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API