Legal Opinion
United States v. Section 18, Township 23, Range 9, Sunnyview Plat, Lots 4 & 5, Block 4
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 30, 1992No. Nos. 91-35121, 91-35158PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
This case involves an action by the government under 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(7) for forfeiture of a tract of land and a mobile home which were used to commit and facilitate a violation of the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. § 841. Diana Carl*517son, the owner of the land, and Richard Malmgren, the owner of the mobile home, timely filed separate claims contesting the forfeitures. Carlson’s claim was dismissed before trial under the doctrine of collateral estoppel because she had pled guilty to the underlying criminal charge. As a result, the land was forfeited to the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Haring v. ProsiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Levi Strauss & Co., a Delaware Corporation v. Blue Bell, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- David H. Bruce v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Jiron v. City of LakewoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. $133,420.00 in United States CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Angela AguilarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Kenneth Alan ClagettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Real Property Known as 22249 Dolorosa StreetCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.