Legal Opinion

Irving v. Cunningham

California Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1888No. 11067PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Alameda County, restraining the sheriff from enforcing a writ of possession. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Foote, C.

This is an appeal from an order restraining the sheriff of Alameda County from executing a writ of possession for certain lands, so as to remove therefrom John Long, B. Van Wyman, and Lewis Hellans.

It appears that on the twenty-sixth day of June, 1883, Henry P. Irving obtained a judgment in ejectment for the lands occupied by the moving parties herein, but it is claimed that they were not parties to the action in which the judgment was obtained, and did not claim title thereto under the defendants therein, either in good faith or collusively; that the possession of the moving parties…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Le Roy v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Long v. NevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Ford v. DoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Merrill v. WrightNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  2. McDonald v. KelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  3. Dobbins v. Economic Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API