Legal Opinion

Dobbins v. Economic Gas Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1920No. L. A. No. 6171Published

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion

THE COURT.

In denying the petition of the defendant for a rehearing we deem .it well to discuss two points which are raised by the petition. The first is that the trial court found that the Peoples Gas and Coke Company never had any title to the mortgaged property, and from this it is argued that the defendant by its purchase through Hayes .from the Gas and Coke Company acquired no title, and was therefore not a purchaser pendente lite and not subject to the rule that the statute of limitations will not run in favor of such a purchaser in possession during the pendency of the litigation. ■ It…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Graham's Heirs v. KitchenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  3. Irving v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API