Legal Opinion

Claim of Utley v. General Motors Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 19, 2001PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Crew III, J.

Appeal from an amended decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed February 4, 1999, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant had sustained a total industrial disability that was not subject to apportionment.

In September 1987 claimant, a machine operator, sustained a compensable injury to his back and right knee when he fell at his place of employment. Claimant received workers’ compensation benefits until August 1988, at which time he returned to work in a light duty capacity. When light duty work no longer was available, claimant was classified as permanently partially…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of August v. Chromalloy R & TAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Claim of Campbell v. AC Rochester ProductsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Claim of Spangenberg v. View Point Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Claim of Forte v. City & SuburbanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Claim of Sacco v. Mast Advertising/PublishingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Barsuk v. BarsukAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Claim of McCloskey v. Marriott Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Claim of Newman v. Xerox Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API