Legal Opinion

Claim of Forte v. City & Suburban

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 14, 2002PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrew Iii, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed March 21, 2001, which ruled that claimant’s work-related injury caused a mild partial disability and made an award of workers’ compensation benefits.

Claimant sustained a work-related back injury in January *7391997 and thereafter was paid worker’s compensation benefits at the maximum rate, reflecting a total disability, until March 1997, at which time the benefit rate was reduced to reflect a mild partial disability. This reduction apparently was based upon a report of the consultant for the employer’s workers’ compensation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of Rochel v. Gardiner Manor MallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Claim of Utley v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Claim of Spangenberg v. View Point Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Claim of Harrington v. L.C. Whitford Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Barsuk v. BarsukAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Claim of Thomas Bonner v. Brownell Steel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Hernandez v. Excel Recycling Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Matter of Tenecela v. Vrapo ConstructionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API