Legal Opinion
Barsuk v. Barsuk
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 29, 2005PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed November 17, 2003, which ruled that claimant’s work-related injury resulted in a 90% schedule loss of use of the right arm.
In 1997, claimant suffered a near amputation of his right arm when he fell into a scrap metal shearing machine on which he was performing maintenance. As a result of this accident, claimant applied for and received workers’ compensation benefits. In 2003, a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge rejected claimant’s position that he was totally industrially disabled, determined that he had a 90% schedule loss of use…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Claim of Forte v. City & SuburbanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Claim of Campbell v. AC Rochester ProductsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Claim of Utley v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by10 opinions
- Claim of Kucuk v. Hickey Freeman Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Claim of Sacco v. Mast Advertising/PublishingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Matter of Walker v. Darcon Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Claim of Newman v. Xerox Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Claim of Wooding v. Nestle USA, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.