State v. Dick
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
Defendant appeals from an order revoking his probation. He argues that the court erred in revoking his probation without providing notice, hearing, or waiver of counsel. The state concedes the trial court’s error but asks us to dismiss the appeal as moot because defendant has already completed his sentence. See Thompson v. Prinslow, 138 Or App 183, 906 P2d 310 (1995); State v. Chase, 120 Or App 523, 851 P2d 637 (1993).
Defendant offers only the following in response to the state’s request:
“This case will not be rendered moot even if defendant is released from custody and his term of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Barnes v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Thompson v. PrinslowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. StroudCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Dunn v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. MorterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- State v. Preston-MittaschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.